Comments for Paper Money Price Guide.com

Comment on how much is a ten dollar gold certificate series of 1914 2-B by zman492

zman492 — Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:39:07 +0000

I am pretty sure you have a Federal Reserve Note instead of a Gold Certificate. I say that for two reasons.

(1) There were no 1914 $ 10 Gold Certificates.

(2) The”2-B” indicates the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and would not appear on a Gold Certificate.

Assuming it is a 1914 $ 10 Federal Reserve Note the value will depend upon:

(1) the color of the seal
(2) if the seal is blue the signatures on the bill and
(3) the condition of the bill.

The bills with red seals are worth more than the bills with blue seals.

Of the bills with blue seals those with the signatures of Burke and Glass are worth more.

If the bill is in “good” condition it is probably worth less than $ 100. If you are lucky enough to have a bill in “Gem Crisp Uncirculated (65)” condition it is probably worth over $ 1,000 if it has a blue seal and over $ 5,000 if it has a red seal. (These are the prices a retailer would charge when selling the bill to a collector. The same retailer would not pay as much when buying the bill.)

Comment on Why do Ron Paultards equate his plan with ‘liberty’ when it achieves exactly the opposite? by molotovmania

molotovmania — Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:42:26 +0000

Ron Paul is not as Anarchist or Corporatist as you depict him to be. He does want to limit/remove government programs, but not even close to the extent you think. No politician could ever have a chance in hell at winning an election without being somewhat moderate. It’s just as stupid to say that Obama is a Marxist or Sanatorium is a Fascist

Comment on Why do Ron Paultards equate his plan with ‘liberty’ when it achieves exactly the opposite? by Jim

Jim — Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:16:23 +0000

you ran off the rails when you equated conservatives with Ron Paul. Ron Paul is as conservative as Jimmuh Cautuh was. as for going back to the gold standard, there isn’t enough gold in the known universe to equal the U.S. economic output today, so that’s a non starter

Comment on Why do Ron Paultards equate his plan with ‘liberty’ when it achieves exactly the opposite? by Muted

Muted — Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:42:51 +0000

you are an idiot! Ron Paul supporters are less paranoid then people like you!

Comment on Why do Ron Paultards equate his plan with ‘liberty’ when it achieves exactly the opposite? by Richie Franklin

Richie Franklin — Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:31:08 +0000

“Whenever I see “tards” and “moron” I know I have come across another liberal poster child”

So does that mean when I see a neo con using the word ‘libtard’,that means they are a closet lib thats just trying to discredit the right wing?

Forgot your meds again today old boy?

Comment on what would this world be without money and power? by NikkiSevens

NikkiSevens — Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:47:28 +0000

There would be fewer people as there was before money became (mainstream). for example, when the barter and trade system was in place our families were smaller and smarter about how to take care of themselves. But it can’t all be taken away at once… pandimonium would ensue.

Comment on what would this world be without money and power? by sylvia a

sylvia a — Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:47:32 +0000

Money is power.

Its hard to know whatt the world would be like without it, or if it would function at all.

Wouldn’t we as humans find something else to fight over?

Comment on what would this world be without money and power? by nsearchofstars

nsearchofstars — Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:43:34 +0000

Power abhors a vacuum. So there would always be power, even if it’s by committee.

As for money, it’s been tried ….before currency was invented. It did not make people any happier than they are now …it actually made their life harder.

Comment on what would this world be without money and power? by rjernigan356

rjernigan356 — Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:20:22 +0000

Would we all be happy without money and power? Sure, if you don’t mind raising chickens to trade with the guy that raises wheat and makes bicycles. As long as you don’t mind the utter chaos and anarchy that would ensue if there was absoutely no power structure. As long as you don’t mind pure darwinism where the strong will survive and the weak will die off. For instance, computer geeks are necessary in our current system because we need our technology to work. If we had no money, there would be no use for them, and the foot ball players would subjugate ‘geeky’ type people and take their food, water and shelter.

Ever watched about 20 or 30 kids on a playground – or one of those little play areas in the mall? Utter chaos, no structure, no Idea about wealth, power or money. That is the type of cluster f*ck I am talking about. Everyone milling around, wondering what to do next, and doing their own thing, with no efficency or effectivness.

Think about this a little further…

Comment on what would this world be without money and power? by dad

dad — Tue, 07 Feb 2012 04:20:41 +0000

If you took money away now it would be hell on earth most would starve or freeze to death or the big guy would take what little food you do have . Money,s not a bad thing its the people with all the money that’s bad.